Four members of the Mikisew Cree First Nation have applied to the courts for a judicial review after their challenges to the Nation’s 2026 election results were rejected.
Following the vote, eight Nation members filed appeals on a range of grounds.
On July 16, the Nation’s independent Appeal Committee dismissed all eight, issuing written reasons on Sept. 15. Four of those unsuccessful appellants have now launched a judicial-review application asking a court to quash the committee’s rulings and order the appeals reheard.
The applicants mainly criticize procedural steps taken by the committee, claiming those steps were unfair or inconsistent with Mikisew custom. None of those allegations has yet been examined by a judge.
Mikisew stresses that a judicial review is not a fresh appeal of the election outcome. Its purpose is simply to determine whether the Appeal Committee’s process was procedurally fair, reasonable and lawful.
Success for the applicants would normally result only in a new hearing before the same committee, not a new election.
Under the Nation’s customary election rules, the Appeal Committee functions separately from chief and council.
Leadership played no part in the procedural choices now under challenge, and the committee retained its own legal counsel throughout the appeal process.
Mikisew’s lawyers expect the judicial-review proceedings could last as long as a year.
In the meantime, the current chief and council will continue to carry out their responsibilities.
Comments